Nothing like cutting to the chase. Doug Badgero, in a comment on WUWT, wrote:
I don’t want scientists stating normative arguments about policy as scientifically based. I want scientists explaining a hypothesis, providing me with ALL of the data that supports or refutes that hypothesis, and the uncertainties involved in that data. Their opinion on the normative arguments about what, if anything, to do about their hypothesis is no more important than mine.
I don't know who Mr. Badgero is, but I suspect he is a retired horticulturist in Michigan.
No comments:
Post a Comment